Home Page         Attorneys         Staff        Media         Radio Show         Resources         Ask An Attorney         Directions         Contact Us     
AREAS OF LAW
Auto Accidents Bankruptcy Law Business Law Criminal Law Defamation Employment Law Estate Law Family Law Foreclosures Immigration Law Ley de Inmigración Incorporation ITAR Compliance Malpractice Mediation Personal Injury Premise Liability Property Law Sexual Harassment Slip & Fall Injuries Social Security Tax Law & Services Wills & Trusts Workers Comp Wrongful Death
Florida Bar Board Certified
Maurice Arcadier

Melbourne Local Resources

Is it better to have a Jury hear my case in an injury case?

Notable Legal Cases

If I am injured in an accident, is it better to have a Jury hear my case?

Our system of jurisprudence originated with ther fundamental right of trial by jury. In other words, our system of justice was intended to be governed by the will of our peers; to have fate and wrongdoing be determined by a pool of society rather than a single authoritarian power. When an individual or an entity has an actionable wrong committed against it, then, in theory, a right to a trial by jury is authorized as a matter of right. Due to political powers and stressors this system of justice and jurisprudence is not only under attack, it has been significantly compromised due to negative advertisements, creative media, and contracts compelled by the powerful to the meek.

Traditionally, our Court system is overseen by a Judge who determines what the laws are, and a jury to determine what the facts are. What damages are, is often within the purview of a jury as authorized by the legal guidelines which is administered by a judge.

In a personal injury context, the law provides for an aggrieved Plaintiff who has been injured through negligence by a Defendant to be made whole. But how do you make someone thats lost a limb whole? How much money is a limb worth? Thats where a good lawyer can explain to a jury the true harm of the injury. Therefore, good lawyering with a sympathetic jury can award sums of money which may seem exorbitant to sum.

Creative lobbying has created laws that assist Judges in reducing amounts that seem exorbitant through a remittur procedure. Some call this an interference with our trial by juries, others call this a system for checks and balances. The result has been that the days of exorbitant jury verdicts are all but over.

But the current climate does not stop there. Laws now permit emp[loyers, for instance, to require prospective employees to waive their rights to trial by jury or even a court trial altogether through the use of an aribtrator and an arbitration proceeding. Moreover, even if an employer does not have the forsight to require an employee to enter into such an agreement prior to being employed, a conservative supreme court has permitted an increase in flexibility for Judges to dismiss cases under a Rule 56 otherwise known as a Summary Judgment proceeding.

When filing a complaint, an aggreived plaintiff in the personal injury context (in Florida) has an option to choose trial by Jury or to waive such a right. And while the strength of the trial by jury procedure has been significantly compromised in recent years, it is still often the preferable process in a personal injury case. In short, do not waive your trial by jury. Seek an experienced attorney who can maximize the remaining rights available, and seek redress through your peers, as it was originally intended by our founding fathers.


More Information: Jury trial in the context of a personal injury case
Attorney: Maurice Arcadier
Status: Blog
Date Filed: August 5, 2011


Our Melbourne office is centrally located in Brevard County, enabling our lawyers to serve clients throughout "the Space Coast", including Cocoa Beach, Palm Bay and Vero Beach.



NOTABLE CASES

BLOG

ASK   AN   ATTORNEY



Call Now!

(321) 953-5998